|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
Arosth Katsbalger
DISSPACHERS
|
Posted - 2011.01.06 03:56:00 -
[1]
maybe people were making wayyyy too much isk and the ones who aren't innovative enough to figure out how to make isk complained about how there were so many toons richer than they were. so they had to "balance" it all in such a way as to make it "fair". i agree with some others why fix what is not broken? just optimize it. the UI in test atm is alot more efficient and intuitive. that is what people wanted, not the possibility of a complete nerf job. i like the whole concept of PI as it sets up for a deeper story and the eventuality of Dust becoming a reality. i mean hell, what have you got to fight for if there isn't land to fight over right?
|
Arosth Katsbalger
DISSPACHERS
|
Posted - 2011.01.07 00:05:00 -
[2]
Siyk: Thats my point you take the time to try and figure out the best way to make loads of isk while others want to take the time to just gripe about how they don't have isk and want to force so called "balancing". And just so you know Allison, i have been a loyal/casual(casual in that Eve ain't my life) gamer for 7 years(one account) and to say that is to me an inaccurate generalization. I play the game now for the soul purpose of being entertained, not like in the beginning when managing a big corp would give me stomach aches from stress LOL. Everything I have, I have worked my butt off for. PI has the potential for making a lot of isk and to see the nerf bat slowly being revealed bothers me as it always has when they take it out. I play this game because it is fun and it is in my opinion the most stunningly rendered online game in existence and its potential knows no bounds. Keep the UI changes and if you have to move the drill heads, move them upon depletion of a site until it recycles or something of that nature. Don't alter the cpu and pg requirements unless you are going to offer a skill optimizer for time taken to learn how to run a site more efficiently.
|
Arosth Katsbalger
DISSPACHERS
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 21:45:00 -
[3]
It is unfortunate but they are prob going to leave it as it is now. If they change it I will be surprised. It never ceases to amaze me that you, the few in in this thread, are trying to tell the makers that this PG change is not acceptable. We like the UI leave that don't change the PG CPU reqs. This is how we want it. If there are those out there that do want to change this stuff then they need to be in here giving a valid explanation as to why it is necessary. But alas, they aren't in here telling us this but we are here telling you the makers what we want and it seems to be falling on deaf ears. I guess I should not be surprised, it has been happening this way for the 7 years I have been playing. I guess the nanny ideology is what holds true. The makers know what is best for us.....
|
Arosth Katsbalger
DISSPACHERS
|
Posted - 2011.01.21 01:52:00 -
[4]
Is it just me or has lag increased and fps dropped after placing extractor heads?
|
|
|
|